Impact of Public Smoking Ban

Impact of Public weed BanFor decades, Malaysia has severe problems with prat- fume issues (Mackay 1996). Currently, gage has been recognized as the major do drugs killer in Malaysia, bringing with its huge human and economic costs. As a result, afflictions caused by cig argontte gage have taken the lives of or so 3,500 Malayan citizens in each amicable class (Facts Ab egress tobacco plant fastb on the whole 2008). There are 3 types of pottyrs, namely social smokers, casual smokers and mountain chain smokers. The Malayan g everywherenment enforces laws to nullify take judge so that Malaysian citizens can enjoy healthy lifestyles.Cigarette smoking accounts for a gigantic 25% of wholly deaths in Malaysia, with smoking-related deaths making up of three out of five of the top causes of death in Malaysia (Mackay 1996). In addition, a enquiry shows that the per centimeages of lung malignant neoplastic disease incidents have been increased at a rate of 17% a year (Smokin g Statistics 2002). According to the result of a survey on poove smoking rates in Malaysia, there were 3.6 one thousand thousand smokers in the year 2000. Nevertheless, the number is expected to rise dramatically by 2025. It was excessively implant that about 49% of Malaysian males smoked bottoms in the year 2000 while the number will be expected to reduce by 30% by the year 2025. By 2025, it is estimated that 4% of all Malaysian women who smoke cans are those of 15 geezerhood of age and above. The research withal shows that most of the smokers start smoking in their youth. Therefore, it is clear that the smoking rates are the highest among the younger generations (Prostar n.d.).1.3 Aim of researchThe aim of this research is to station the distinct types of smokers and evaluate the effectiveness of law implementation on cigarette smoking by the Malaysian political relation in order to reduce smoking rates and possibly to ban smoking in Malaysia for the benefit of Malaysia ns health.1.4 MethodologyA survey was conducted to collect the data about the different types of smokers namely social smokers, casual smokers, chain smokers and the opinions of smokers towards cigarette smoking with a questionnaire. A sample of 20 participants between 11 and 50 years old was taken for this survey.2.0 Types of Smokers2.1 Social SmokersSocial smokers are defined as people who smoke mainly or scarcely in social settings and in the presence of others (New Straits Times 1997). Social smokers are overly have it offn as occasional smokers (Morley et.al 2006). In addition, social smokers are much much likely to have relatives or friends who smoke than those who have never smoked. Figure 1 above indicates that 27% of smokers are social smokers.2.2 occasional(a) SmokersCasual smokers are defined as people who smoke on many but non all days and also smokers who know how to control on their smoking, going from smoking daily to only smoking occasionally (New Straits Tim es 1997). Based on the research, it was found that only 9% of smokers are casual smokers (Figure 1). Therefore, the problem with casual smokers is that they do not think that they are addicted. They think that they can switch their desire to smoke on and off and that they have a full control over whether or not they want to smoke (Turner 2008).2.3 Chain SmokersChain smokers are also known as addicted smokers who smoke in a chain of cigarettes, one after another. Chain smoking is the practice of brightness a new cigarette immediately after one is finished, sometimes using the previous cigarette to light the next one. It is a quality of addiction and gives the smokers a constant source of nicotine that allows smokers to witness a hotshot of calmness (Windale n.d.). Based on the survey, 64% of the smokers are chain smokers which confer the largest number of smokers in this survey (Figure 1).3.0 Advantages of cigarette smoking3.1 Economical percentageThe baccy industry has contri buted to the countrys major economy in terms of avocation (be it in manufacturing, agricultural and health sectors), earnings, exports and valuatees (The Economics of Tobacco Policy n.d.). It was shown that RM1.8 million in indirect taxes and RM683 million in corporate taxes had contributed into Malaysian brass revenue. Based on a research, it was indicated that 7.8% of the Malaysian organisations income tax revenue was contributed by indirect taxes from the tobacco industry while approximately 3% of the Malaysian governments income tax revenue was derived from corporate taxes within the tobacco industry.3.2 Mental mitigation3.2.1 Stress ReliefBased on the relief survey conducted in figure 2, 38% of the smokers consume tobacco to relieve their focus. Therefore, cigarette smoking is one of the stress management tools for those who suffer from work-related stress as vigorous as family-related stress. A cigarette contains over 4000 different chemicals which could cause crabmeat (Healey 2001). The poisonous and addictive drug in tobacco which is nicotine could reduce smokers stress levels and it could increase heart rates up to 21 beats per thin and also stimulates the nervous system to make the smokers feel a maven of relief or relaxation (Healey 2001). Besides, smoking creates a numerous conditions that could table service the smokers with anxiety and depression (Smoking and mental health 2007).3.2.2 Memory improvementIt is found that nicotine in cigarettes may improve keeping and prevent Alzheimers and Parkinsons diseases. Other than that, it is proven that nicotine can help in improving learning ability and memory problems associated with hypothyroidism. In addition, Victorian doctors also recommended smoking as a mover of sharpening the wits and boosting concentration (Derbyshire 2008). Based on the survey conducted, 43% of the smokers feel that smoking cigarettes can help them to improve their memory (Figure 2).4.0 Disadvantages of cigarette sm oking4.1 Health effects4.1.1 Lung malignant neoplastic diseaseIn Malaysia, lung cancer is now an progressively significant cause of death. It is classified as the most common cancer caused by cigarette smoking in Malaysia. Based on the 2003 field Cancer Registry of Malaysia report, lung cancer accounts for 13.8% and 3.8% of all cancers in males and females respectively. To be more precise, Malaysia has faced 1,758 cases of Malaysians who are diagnosed with lung cancer annually in 2003( roleplaying against lung cancer 2006).4.2 environmental effectsAccording to Tobacco Control, the research shows that cigarette smoke commonly produces more air pollution as compared to the diesel car exhaust. From the scientific research, it shows that a cigarette contains over 4000 different chemicals including many toxic substances (Healey 2001). Therefore, the cigarette can create air pollution, the cigarette buds are also a major blow to the environment hygiene (Impact of Butt Littering n.d.). In addition, cigarette smoke also causes potential fire hazards if the lighting cigarette is not put out immediately (Slovenian Young Minds n.d.). In addition, about 3,000 lung cancer deaths in non-smoking adults each year are caused by the exposure of tobacco smoke from smokers. Also, an increased risk of lower respiratory tract infections is put down in infants and young children whose parents smoke in their presence.5.0 Actions taken by the government5.1 Legislation5.1.1 The Control of Tobacco Products mandate 1993The Malaysian government has assay to curb smoking among Malaysians by implementing the Control of Tobacco Products Regulation in 1993. This ordination was enforced in 1993 under the Food Act 1993, which all direct advertising and sponsorship are prohibited as well as the requirement of fixed health warnings, and also ceiling levels of tar (20mg) and nicotine (1.5mg) are displayed(Tobacco Unit Malaysia 2003). Besides, smoking restrictions are applied at globe places and particularized places such as air-conditioned places. Those places are normally set as no smoking zones while tobacco sales to any individual under the age of 18 years old is strictly prohibited. This regulation is also revise to strengthen the restriction towards the total ban of tobacco-related promotions, the requirements of more effective health warnings, and the limitation to the availability of cigarettes, and the lowering of tar and nicotine levels in order to extend the existing non smoking zone.5.1.2 Tobacco Control ActThis act will be replacing The Control of Tobacco Products Regulation 1993 to be the prominent comprehensive legislation for tobacco control in Malaysia. The function of this act is to fit in all relevant feed and country obligations stated in the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (Tobacco Unit Malaysia 2003).5.2 Augmentation in taxation of cigarettesAccording to the Maybank Investment coin bank Berhad, raising taxes on tobacco is one of the m ost effective ship canal of reducing the amount of people who smoke. Therefore, the Malaysian Government has taken go to increase the tobacco taxes by at least 11 per cent in 2009 in order to discourage smoking among Malaysians and cuts its budget (Malaysia may raise tobacco taxes n.d.). Meanwhile, the Malaysian government also tends to raise cigarettes terms by 40% (World Health Organization 2008). Albeit the decision of the Malaysian government has diminished demand of smokers but government revenues need were not affected.5.3 bulwark on advertisements and other promotionsThe advertisements and promotions of smoking or tobacco products should be restrict in Malaysia. In Malaysia, some restrictions have been utilize for the descriptive labeling of cigarettes, such as lights, ultra lights, low tar or mild on their packaging. Besides that, cigarette manufacturers are forbidden from promoting cigarettes (Government puts the gormandise on cigarette makers 2008). Therefore, to arg ue against the cigarette advertisements, the Malaysian government has intervened to introduce anti-smoking campaign to conjure up the dangers of smoking by placing advertisements during prime time warning. Based on statistics, it was indicated that among 4 million smokers, 1,000 smokers died due to tobacco-related diseases every year. In this case, the Malaysian government had implemented all kinds of legislation to reduce the percentages of death from tobacco-related diseases.5.3.1 Packaging and labelinghttp//www.smoke-free.ca/warnings/warningsimages/malaysia/Malays4.jpghttp//www.smoke-free.ca/warnings/warningsimages/malaysia/Malays12.jpgDiagram 1 Samples of health warning on cigarette packagesThe Malaysian government has amended the Control of Tobacco Products Regulations 2004 on World No Tobacco mean solar day (WNTD), May 31 to urge tobacco manufacturers to display health warnings on cigarette packages. The health warnings such as lung cancer, mouth diseases, heart diseases and carious infants graphics should be displayed on cigarette packages to warn smokers of the consequences of smoking (Health Ministrys tobacco rules get thumbs-up 2008). In addition, all packages are required to include intense warnings that could cover 40% of the front of the packages and 60% of the back of the package (Government puts the squeeze on cigarette makers 2008).6.0 ConclusionMore effective actions should be taken by the Malaysian government to ban smoking in public areas such as hospitals, clinics, public lifts, toilets, air-conditioned restaurants, public transport, government premises, educational institutions, petrol stations, internet cafes and shopping complexes. Heavy fines could be an alternative to vindicate those who smoke in public areas. Besides, the Malaysian government could include the advantage of rules and regulations on smokers who continue to smoke. Even though tobacco contributes significant tax revenues to Malaysian government, we should also be aw are of the increasing costs on health care to curb health problems derived from smoking. We cannot totally ban smokers from smoking cigarettes, our government should play a leading role to educate all generations about the negative effects of smoking. Incentives and taxes should be imposed to curb health problems such as heart diseases and lung cancer. Therefore, the Malaysian government should enforce tougher laws on tobacco smoking in order to have healthier Malaysian.